Click Here to Visit our Sponsor

The Viewer's Forum is a platform where you can share your views with others on any particular current issue.

Pakistanis are invited to give their opinion on whether or not the country should sign the CTBT. Non-Pakistani viewers are also requested to give an objective view on this issue from the international perspective.

CTBT text

(Your messages should not exceed 250 words)

Please Note
The views in this forum are from the contributors' perspectives.
The Editor does not necessarily subscribe to the views. Only those
opinions will be included that bear the name and country of the sender.

Your Opinion

1. Pakistan should sign and participate to the maximum in the CTBT. Having been this past year a visitor to Pakistan, observing in pain the deplorable and inhumane conditions the majority of the citizens of this country are living in, it is not conceivable to one with any regard for human dignity that Pakistan leaders consider for a moment the thought of developing advanced nuclear status or capabilities. Pakistan has nothing that any other country in the world either wants or needs, therefore no need for weapons of defence.
   
   Pakistan has not the resources or ability to govern another country, therefore no need for offensive weapons. Whatever financial resources are being considered for the advancement of offensive weapons systems, (Pakistan would not use nuclear force on itself), should be redirected to increase the level of human dignity of its citizens. All citizens should have educational opportunities. All citizens should have sanitary, disease-free water to drink. All babies should have the required medication available to ensure their growth and health. All women should be educated in the methods of and advantages of birth control. All cities should have a viable waste disposal system. The list is endless with regards to what the Pakistan citizens need just to be at the minimum of what is considered humane. Weapons funds redirected toward improving the humane needs of this country would add strength to its position in the world family.
   
   Jesse G Boatman
   United States of America
   
   
   
2. Pakistan should demand the independence of KASHMIR, before signing the CTBT.
   
   Khalid Mahmood
   CA, USA
   
   
   
3. I am in favour of signing the CTBT for the following reasons:
   1. We have tested enough material for our protection against any aggression and are capable of forceful retaliation.
   2. How many tests and how many more atom bombs are necessary to ensure our protection? Can anyone tell me which kind of safety precautions we have against a simple air or missile attack (underground bunkers and other measures)?
   3. Look at Russia, in spite of possessing countless nuclear devices, it is weightless. Therefore, we should use our energies and resources on the fruitful purposes e.g. education and health etc.
   4. It will certainly help to reduce the war hysteria in our country. (Please remove all these atom bomb and missile models across the country. I am really ashamed of such a senseless attitude of our nation).
   
   First time in our 50 years history, we have a real government, which is likely to be serious and determined to do something for this poor and non-serious country. Therefore, I beg to say that please do not keep it busy in such kind of activities (as practised by Zia-ul-Haq).
   
   Mian
   Hamburg
   
   
   
4. The CTBT is a very critical issue. If Pakistan signs on it then it would be equivalent to cutting your hand yourself. I strongly request the Govt. of Pakistan not to sign on CTBT. Once we sign on this, India will try to rule our heads and no Pakistani can appreciate this.
   
   Syed Muhammad Akhter
   Saudi Arabia
   
   
   
5. For the prosperity and stability of Pakistan, we should not sign the CTBT. What is this? Who is America? If America needs this ban to be signed by other countries, why did she not start this peaceful and sacred chore by signing herself first? She should prove herself a good example for the whole. She doesn’t want peace in the world. She just wants to push back the Islamic Power and Integrity. The conditional that India signs first is another matter. This matter is not just for India and Pakistan. This is the matter of the whole world. If America is sincere for peace, then she should destroy her all nuclear weapons and chemicals. Why has she not agreed to take such a nice initiative? She can build huge Nuclear Weapons, harmful chemicals and all other human crushing weapons. Our Govt. should raise this critical point to the world not just for Pakistan. This is the voice of the every sensitive person to avoid the world from a big explosion. There should be a comprehensive contract to destroy all the nuclear weapons which the nuclear club have in their possession.
   
   Muhammad Zahid
   Dubai, UAE
   
   
   
6. Stop dear Praveen! Believe me I have met many Indian friends having only one dream that the division is temporary and one day Pakistan shall join them. Forget it! Pakistan is here to stay. You seem not to be able to digest the fact. Believe me only the nations having set of principles can lead the world. As concerned to India, there is none. This secular system of yours cannot give even the basic rights to minorities. Mosques are being demolished, churches are burnt, Sikh temple was destroyed and even the lives of the minorities are not safe. The poor people of Kashmir are suffering for the last 50 years. What else can you expect from a nation that has a terrible fact long ago that " A Maharaja's dynasty had a smoky storm for many days. He called the jotshi who told him that a terrible thing has happened in your state namely an untouched is reading the Holy book Geeta. The Maharaja set on the horse to find that criminal and found that the Shooder was reading the Geeta on the tree. He killed him and then the storm stopped". As far as Muslims are concerned, after 1000 years of rule in India, the Hindus are still in majority and that was the greatness of the Muslims. Facts speak themselves. Muslims were the great and Inshaa Allah they shall be the great nation because they have the set of principles to not only lead but also to rule the world. One beautiful day Kashmir shall be free.
   
   Ibrahim Raja
   Sweden
   
   
   
7. We cannot survive until our security is sure. If we look at the history of big countries they all have tasted nuclear to ensure their security. According to Islam we should be ready every time to defend ourselves. Under all these circumstances Pakistan should not sign the CTBT, and not only this, we should also adopt the latest technique to defend ourselves like all the other big powers.
   
   Naeem Akhtar
   Denmark
   
   
   
8. Pakistan should not sign the CTBT; it should look after the welfare of their poor citizen.
   
   Sultan Ahmed
   Dubai
   
   
   
9. Let the Quraan guide us on the issue of CTBT. It is the right time for us to start debating our role in the world as Pakistani Muslims, not just as Pakistanis. I mean Kashmir is not the only issue here, India is not the issue here either. The issue is 'can we live our lives under the umbrella of prophets? Are we here on this planet to breathe, eat, drink, sleep, wed and depart from it? Those among us who are ready to leave this planet, lived as they wanted to live. Please give us the true words of wisdom. I mean, if a brand new life is offered to you, how will you spend it? How will you spend it? By finding the wisdom first from the book or by agreeing with the wisdom in end of the life? The responsibility is on the mothers and fathers of the nation, whoever they may be, politicians, religious leaders or intellectuals. Today is the foundation of tomorrow! Do we have today in our life? Or are we still fooling with yesterday? If we are aware of what made us today, then yes, tomorrow belongs to us, otherwise, it belongs to them and who are they? What are they looking for in this world? The book is full of answers, with proven record. It is time to make use of these records and find out, what is... "the path of those whom you have blessed, not of those against whom there is displeasure, nor those who go astray." "al fateha. Rediscover the meaning of CTBT.
   
   Mohammad Saleem Ahmad
   USA
   
   
   
10. Some of the views expressed here bring to mind a satire which goes like this, 'There were four guys - American, Chinese, Indian and a Pakistani- sitting in a pub. What would have happened if a fly fell into their beer mug?
    - The American simply threw away the beer and ordered fresh mug
    - The Chinese took out the fly, ate it and threw away the beer
    - The Indian took out the fly from the beer. Sold the fly to the Chinese and beer to the American. From that money he bought another mug of beer.
    - The Pakistani blamed the Indian for the fly, related the event to Kashmir, went to the Chinese for a discussion and support, asked the American for a loan and from that money bought beer.
    
    You should be in a position where no one asks you to sign CTBT or any other crap. It should be your prerogative. Has anyone questioned Japan or any other country with nuclear umbrella for protection from an invisible enemy? Their safety is guaranteed by US in exchange for economic favours. If Pakistan agrees to sign CTBT it should be clear about others' intention. If it decides against it then it should be on its own merit and should be ready to absorb the shock. It's going to be a double-edged sword. In either case there is a chance of getting hurt, so it's a matter of choosing which side is less dangerous. India has stated clearly a number of times that CTBT is one-sided and allows the nuclear powers to retain and produce weapons, and I am in agreement with that too like majority of the Indians.
    
    Arup das Gupta
    Australia
    
    
    
11. The dialogue whether to sign CTBT or not, is on at the moment both in Paksitan and India. Any decision regarding the signing of treaty must be made keeping in view the following points:
    
    1. Long term interests of the country. From the decision of the US congress not to ratify the treaty even after 1045 explosions amounts to the fact that signing this treaty would not help Pakistan to achieve excellence and to keep abreast with the advancement of nuclear
    technology.
    2. Full consensus of the nation which should openly reflect in the media. In my opinion this can't be achieved without holding a nation-wide referendum on the issue especially in the absence of an elected government.
    3. A clear and unforced go-ahead signal from the nuclear scientists.
    
    In the absence of any of these pre-requisites, any attempt to sign CTBT under either the pressure or any temptation from the US, Japan and other western nations would not only be dreadful for the country but also the credibility of army as an institution would be gone. If this happens then we the Pakistanis would lose the last hope of a respectful survival which has been very much the "army itself".
    
    Ahmad Ali
    Bristol, UK
    
    
    
12. I think all patriotic Indians hope that Pakistan does NOT sign the CTBT, that it continues to divert resources to missiles and to warheads and spends even more keeping its armed forces well paid and fed. It not only removes the pressure on India, but also ensures and hastens the disintegration of Pakistan. All without having to do much of anything. So keep it up guys. Don't change a thing, you are already perfect. Don't go for this "democracy" stuff, ramp up those "madrassas". We are rooting for you. I do want you to know I/we say this in a caring sort of way.
    
    Raj Kumar
    Connecticut, USA
    
    
    
13. Even if India signs, Pakistan should not sign the CTBT. We should not trust non-Muslims. Allah has very clearly mentioned in the Qur'an, that non-Muslims can never favour Muslims. Our non-sense leadership has tested USA many times and all of the times Pakistan was deceived.
    
    Foreign Minister Mr. Abdul Sattar says that CTBT will not affect Pakistan's atomic situation, which certainly is not true and logical. It is very well known that detective instruments are already in Pakistan, in the US embassy. Once we sign everybody will watch how new rules will be formed about CTBT and all of them will go against Pakistan. It is a humble request to Pakistan Government from me and from all Muslims here in the USA not to sign CTBT or any other such treaty.
    
    Zahid Qureshi
    USA
    
    
    
14. Pakistan should not sign the CTBT. Look at history, few months ago when India tested its first nuclear bomb Pakistan waited for about a week to see the international reaction. No country issued any statement against India. When Pakistan was ready to do so, Mr. Bill Clinton, and Tony Blair from the UK urged Nawaz Sharif not to test the nuclear bomb. And they offered some sort of economic aid which they always do. Now one thing is clear, that no country is going to protect us in times of war. You have to defend yourself and to do so you must go " head to head" or ahead of your enemy.
    
    Mohammed Waseem Khan
    Los Angeles, USA
    
    
    
15. Whatever the CTBT issue is and its implications on who signs it or who doesn't is not a thing that can be sorted out in a few minutes or days. Every country has its right to decide what's good and what's bad and act accordingly.
    
    Kamesh
    India
    
    
    
16. This is a reply to Indian opinions, they want that Pakistan should sign the CTBT. My Indian friends do not know all about this matter, they are just afraid of Pakistan being a powerful country. Mr M Kasim from India comments that Pakistan is absolutely wrong, he should better look into India's own doings first. He does not know the meaning of poverty; had he known he would never blame Pakistan for poverty. Pakistan is a rich country now. Its citizens are not like "POOR INDIANS" who kill each other just for a piece of ROTI. Am I wrong?
    
    Muhammad Shoaib
    Georgia, USA
    
    
    
17. I think we have achieved our goal by testing the atom bomb. We have become a nuclear power. If our nuclear experts think that signing the CTBT will not harm our nuclear program and we will not have to reverse our preparation for the atom bomb, then Pakistan can sign the CTBT. However, before signing, Pakistan must
    ensure these points:
    
    a) Get the maximum advantageous for signing the treaty.
    b) We will not allow any inspection of our nuclear program.
    c) Make it clear that if India does something mischievous, we shall be free to retaliate.
    
    If the above points are ensured, only then the government should sign the CTBT.
    
    Qamar Nawab
    Karachi, Pakistan
    
    
    
18. It is nice that Jang is asking opinions from Pakistanis living abroad. Pakistan should not sign CTBT unless India does so. Even then Pakistan must make sure that it is capable at India level or more. This is the only field where Pakistan has an advantage. Pakistan should never listen to America or any other country. They will never help Pakistan as has happened in the past. As late president Zia had said Pakistanis have to fight their own war. We must be ready. Unless Pakistan has a sincere and honest leadership, the goal cannot be achieved. Only and only true Muslims can face the world with courage.
    
    Mohammad Amin
    Seattle, USA
    
    
    
19. Do not sign the CTBT- NEVER. You can never trust Non-Muslims.
    
    Saeed Lodhi
    USA/Kuwait
    
    
    
20. CTBT is not in favour of our country and particularly for Muslim nation at this stage. Pakistan has to go further with testing not only for its security reasons but also for assuring security to other Muslim countries. Ultimately Pakistan will be developed economically. The Indian Prime Minister was forced to ndia was not listening to Pakistan; it was only the nuclear blast when come to Lahore for negotiation after 50-years to talk about Kashmir...the only problem between Pakistan and India. Even the UNO has not been listening to the cry of Kashmiri Muslims until now, although their observers are available in Kashmir since 1948. Three 3 Indo-Pak wars have been fought in Kashmir. Hence I request Pakistan Government not to sign this CTBT.
    
    Abdul Ghaffar Khan
    Saudi Arabia
    
    
    
21. I think that signing this CTBT won't make any difference for anybody at all. It is just another example of American hypocrisy and arrogance. America didn't sign it, but wants all other countries to do so- maybe they think that all non-Americans are idiots. Peace in the subcontinent is the dream of all Pakistanis and Indians, but it can be reached only by electing "real" leaders and increasing the literacy rate of both populations.
    
    Tofieq Shahwali
    St. Petersburg
    
    
    
22. Pakistan should sign the CTBT, as it will at least gain some respect in the eyes of the donors (western countries). Over the past one year, incident after incident have eroded the image of a peaceful Pakistan and reinforced the image of a fundamentalist and warmongering nation among the people of the world. The irresponsible utterances by various politicians during the Kargil conflict about using nuclear weapons against the 'no first use' policy adopted by India has made it look juvenile and without adequate restraints. Whether nuclear or non-nuclear Pakistan is always going to find it difficult to defeat India in a straight war. The future of Pakistan depends on signing up the CTBT and giving up all sorts of support for terrorism in the name of "Jehad". It should give itself 50 years for economic progress and development of the people and leave all the Muslims in the world till then to live in there own plight. Frankly, a Pakistan with a begging bowl and tottering social order, shedding tears about the well being of Muslims from Chechnya to Kashmir is nothing but comical. Hope good sense prevails before it becomes difficult for others to differentiate Afghanistan from Pakistan.
    
    Chandrasekher
    Indian/USA
    
    
    
23. I don't know what kind of text books are used in schools in Pakistan. How this Hate India concept is generated in Pakistanis? Friends, it is very unfortunate that your leaders and army both have been making fool of you since your independence. Your leaders did not have vision but only to sell the idea that how to hate India. What would happen if both India and Pakistan sign the CTBT? Chances of war would be less. More money available for development instead of bombs. Leaders would be forced to think in terms of development other than war. Friends please suggest your great leaders to have a healthy competition with India. For example look at the education standards: Computers, Medicine, Film Industry and games etc. Don't take me wrong but look at all the people who reach USA from Pakistan most of them are either taxi driver, grocery shop owners or working in fast food restaurants. There are hardly doctors, engineers or other professionals. This is my belief that Pakistani origin people can excel better than Indians if they are given proper guidance and opportunity because they are a much more confident people than the Indians.
    
    Ajay
    USA
    
    
    
24. If the international community including the UNO and superpowers provide security against Indian aggression then we should sign the CTBT, otherwise NO.
    
    Nasir Sherazi
    Canada (Pakistani)
    
    
    
25. Being a Pakistani expatriate in Kuwait, I would suggest that the present military leadership do whatever is beneficial for the future of this ill-fated country. I think if signing the CTBT is fatal for our survival then it must not be signed as we are confronting an arch-rival foe.
    
    Barkatullah Marwat
    Kuwait
    
    
    
26. Of course, the CTBT is a very delicate issue and we have to be very careful about it. But on the other hand we have to think about our security also, whether we are safe after signing the pact. Pakistan should only sign it if India truly does also. Only India is our biggest enemy in the world and the whole world knows about this. Pakistan Zindabad.
    
    Amjad
    USA
    
    
    
27. I request Pakistani Government not to sign CTBT being non-representative of Pakistani people. Let democratic government come and then decide the fate of CTBT. Although it may take 30 years, it would be more beneficial to be away from such anti-Islamic and anti-Pakistani agreement.
    
    Abdul Ghaffar Khan
    Saudi Arabia
    
    
    
28. Pakistan should go for anything, under any circumstances for its security and safety and to avoid war be better prepare for war. But this does not mean what we are doing in our country. On the one side we are beggars and on the other we develop latest technologies. This gap should be minimised. This is the reason that the west has strong argument that why we go for this. Name any Muslim country that is really prosperous without Western aid and help or expertise. It's only the negative thinking that Christianity or West is against us only because we are Muslims. This could be one reason but as Muslims what are we doing? Nigeria, Pakistan, Indonesia, Afghanistan and many other Muslim countries are examples of worst happenings. So for safety of the nation we have to be strong and the leaders should sign or not sign the CTBT or any treaty like this keeping the interest of the nation in view. But poor we, we have no sincere politician or leader left it seems. So we will remain in confusion for many more years on matters like this.
    
    Haider Ali
    The Netherlands
    
    
    
29. There is no harm moving hand in hand with the rest of the world with dignity and honour on the basis of equality and mutual respect. However before signing the CTBT we should ensure the following:
    Not under any kind of pressure. We must have the same privileges and importance in the comity of nations as the rest of the nuclear states and their allies. These have to show a definite change in their attitude and stance towards Pakistan. In the nuclear field we have reached a level in Research and Development that we no longer require to carry out any such tests banned under the treaty. All disputes with India are resolved and she no longer pursues a policy of hegemony and expansion of any kind detrimental to Pakistan and it's interests.
    
    A.K.Tanoli
    Rawalpindi, Pakistan
    
    
    
30. It should be signed over the dead bodies of Pakistanis. NO! NO! NO! Pakistan should not sign it no matter what the odds, because it's a matter of sovereignty and national prestige. Why should we sign it? Give me one single reason, why we should bow our heads before the west. Please tell Musharaf to remain steadfast and say a decisive no to the world. No, never SHOULD Pakistan sign the treaty.
    
    Yasser Ahmad
    Denmark
    
    
    
31. History can manifest adequately, that Pakistani Leadership had been mostly a victim to many such apparently NOBLE intentions of the Western Powers and ended up being BIG losers and silly. For change let's decide in the ABSOLUTE interest of THE GREAT PAKLAND PAKISTAN. No way!
    
    Wg Cdr K.K Tamtons (R)
    UAE
    
    
    
32. As a Muslim, we all know that Islam teaches us to keep peace with every one whether they are Muslims or non-Muslim. But if others (non-Muslims) try to kill you or scare you because of your religion, so only in this situation you are told to go for Holy War. But the whole world media has given it (the Holy War) a totally wrong shape. So, according to this fact Pakistan should sign the CTBT only, if every country signs on this pact. As Muslims, we should have only the fear of Allah, not of any evil-minded personality. We all know that Allah, the only God, created the whole universe and he is the only One, who gives us life and death, and the fear of Allah will come only when we practice Islam with our real intentions. So, if other countries don't sign on CTBT and force Pakistan in their diplomatic way, to sign on CTBT, Pakistan should never sign on it.
    
    Javed Muhammad
    Pakistan
    
    
    
33. Pakistan and India should work together and convince the 5 nuclear powers that to recognise them as nuclear power and then all 7 nuclear powers should be treated at par. Neither Pakistan nor India should sign CTBT till they get this status. In today's world India and Pakistan should understand that destruction of your neighbour is your own destruction. If your neighbour's economy is bad you can't grow. Pakistan and India should not be enemies but should become strategic partners.
    
    Following should be immediately done:
    a) stop propaganda war
    b) sit and talk
    c) try to help each other to overcome internal problems
    d) India should accept Pakistan from its heart
    e) fight jointly against corruption and terrorism
    f) let Kashmiris decide about themselves
    
    Masoud ul Hassan Khalid
    Kuwait
    
    
    
34. We should not sign the CTBT.
    
    Adil Rehman
    Pakistan
    
    
    
35. To me the CTBT is a trap, Pakistan should never be a signatory to this unbalanced and unjust treaty.
    
    Khalid Mahmood Bhatti
    Denmark
    
    
    
36. Most of the Pakistanis are very emotional on this issue. But the reality is that all our leaders like Benazir and Nawaz Sharif who had enjoyed the office of PM two times know and have the opinion that Pakistan should sign the CTBT. It is better for us and for Southeast Asia that India and Pakistan should have a common parliament that will improve the regional social and economical development. It is useless to discuss Kashmir problem because it is a very old issue in which international community has no interest. We should sign the CTBT. We should make common parliament with India. After all we are the same folk with the same language, colour and culture. Our centre should be in the subcontinent not in Centre Asia or Middle East.
    
    Dr. Abdul Khaliq
    Germany (Berlin)
    
    
    
37. I think India should sign the CTBT and should start working on its economic development. India has some serious issues at home- issues like corruption and poverty to name a few and it should stop worrying about Pakistan and Kashmir. India should work on more important issues like dealing with poverty, modernisation and educating its masses. India should sign the CTBT, stop spreading terrorism, in Kashmir, Sri Lanka etc. and all around the world, live peacefully and I can be sure Pakistan will not bother India, as Pakistan is a peace-loving country.
    
    Muhammad Amer
    Pakistan
    
    
    
38. Pakistan SHOULD NOT sign the CTBT, just like India should not. The West wants both countries to sign CTBT for their own interests. But what is in Pakistan's interest? Signing the CTBT will give it some leverage and help it in its quest to overcome its societal and economic problems by getting co-operation from the West and then letting its General run the country. But it can achieve the same results and more by not signing the pact, if only, it sees the ground reality (accept the present LOC), starts engaging India, instead of fighting it. Fighting has never helped anybody. In Pakistan's case, it will harm it more. Mukhtar Naqvi has said in his reply 'Lets see how long Kashmir remains with India'. My feeling is that Kashmir will not come to Pakistan. Many in Pakistan are going to be disappointed in the end. But then it will have been too late. By the time the realisation dawns and something else happens to Kashmir, Pakistan would have spent so many resources on military and non productive things for so long that all those, if spent on Pakistani society, would have propelled it and given much more influence in the world.
    
    A day may come when nuclear weapons may be used by both India and Pakistan (even if India does not say anything). So Pakistan's threat to use nuclear weapons doesn't help it in any way. It is a very risky gamble they have taken by banking on only one factor - their nuclear capability to arm twist most of the world. If this factor is somehow neutralised then what?
    
    Ajay Mittal
    India/USA
    
    
    
39. I think Pakistan should not sign the CTBT, unless India signs it first. Pakistan's policies depend on what India does. We conducted nuclear tests after India. All our missiles like Hatf and Ghauri were created after the creation of Agni and other missiles of India. So in the same way Pakistan should wait and see what India does. The United States used Pakistan against former Soviet Union during the cold war, and as soon as the cold war ended, US showed its back to Pakistan because it did not need Pakistan anymore. If Pakistan thinks that by signing the CTBT first it will earn US favour and signs the CTBT, it will be the biggest mistake ever made by Pak.
    
    Mohammed Atcha
    Chicago, USA
    
    
    
40. Under the present pressure and in the prevailing situation world wide, I believe that sooner or later Pakistan has to sign this treaty. In my opinion Pakistan should sign the CTBT under several conditions i.e. the matter of Kashmir should be solved by the world Chaudry (so called super power) and all debts/loans on Pakistan should be waived. Also, it should be under the condition that Pakistan reserve the right in case India restarts testing. Without these assurances, Pakistan should not sign this treaty.
    
    Zahid Sheikh
    Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
    
    
    
41. Pakistan should not sign CTBT as long as it can afford, but then again the interesting question is, is India or Pakistan rich enough to support such an expensive (nuclear) game? If yes then I will advise both to get their acts together and work for the welfare of their people as well. Such treaties and restrictions are designed for the weak nations. So the last thing Pakistan needs to do is to hand over the right of self-defence as well. Once you are weak and poor you will accept it anyway, so what's the big fuss! Remember atomic power will never rescue us from evil, but a true faith will.
    
    Sanaullah Bhatti
    Sydney, Australia
    
    
    
42. Pakistan was broken in 1971 by India. Over 100,000 Pak army soldiers were made prisoners of war. American fleet did nothing. It was a humiliating defeat for Pakistan. General Yahya who had provided a ladder to USA through Kissinger's mission to China was betrayed.
    
    Pakistan should not sign the CTBT even if the whole world signs. No veto power country of Security Council has been broken like Pakistan was broken by India. No other country has the immediate threat like Pakistan and therefore Pakistan should develop and test its capabilities and upgrade its nuclear arsenal, missile technology and carry out the required tests. Those who are talking of economic development forget that the country comes first and the development comes later. If there is no country, development means nothing. The Governments and autonomy to local bodies at the district level will bring democracy at gross root level.
    
    China has signed CTBT because it has no threat from any neighbour. The Generals think of national issues, well being and prosperity of the country. An army General as head of state is million time better than corrupt politicians who make money by plots, SROs, scandals, sugar exports, scrap imports, commissions, kick backs and what not. Pakistan Paindabad - General Musharraf Zindabad.
    
    M.A. Khan Kiani
    Canada
    
    
    
43. I feel that:
    1. Pakistan can sign on CTBT if India does the same.
    2. We have to gather more test data on nuclear technology works.
    
    Shakil Ahmad
    Lahore
    
    
    
44. We think that Pakistan should not sign the CTBT; it's our gain in 50 years and there are 52 Muslim countries in this world who do not have this, which is a gift from God. We say no to CTBT. Pakistan Zindabad . Lovers of motherland.
    
    Imran, Umer and Ashraf
    Cyprus
    
    
    
45. I have briefly read different opinions on the viewers' forum regarding signing of CTBT by Pakistan. Most of them have suggested that Pakistan should sign if India does so. Some of them have suggested signing so that Pakistan may keep receiving IMF aid (better call it 'LOAN').
    
    I disagree with all of you there. My question to you all is "Why should Pakistan sign CTBT - even if India does so?" Pakistan's nuclear achievements are Pakistan's own efforts, and are a major detonate for safety of the country. Why not let the US, European countries and Israel sign the CTBT first? They are the ones to start this race. The US is in fact the only one who not only started this race but has also used it TWICE against innocent humans in Japan. SHAME ON YOU Americans.
    
    Why did the US congress reject a bill to sign CTBT? Because they know the importance of nuclear detonate, even though there is no country who would dare to use nuclear weapons against the US. Why don't US and European countries start signing the CTBT from their homes first? So, calm down - sit down everybody in your seats and stop this silly debate. PAKISTAN SHOULD NEVER SIGN CTBT for any matter. May Allah help us to be loyal to our religion and nation (Amen)!
    
    Muhammad Amer
    Pakistan
    
    
    
46. Pakistan should never sign on CTBT and whatever assurances and offers are being given by America are just decoys. We urge Pakistani government not to sign on CTBT or any other treaty which is not good in the interest of Pakistan and Muslim ummah. You can control these powers and make them afraid of you only if you keep working on nuclear missile and other latest technology. We have talent in our country. The same talent is working in this country. If we can do here why cannot in Pakistan? We must give more and more of our budget towards scientific projects and researches. God bless Pakistan "ameen".
    
    Javed Mian
    USA
    
    
    
47. If the purpose of CTBT is to stop further proliferation of nuclear weapons, then it is a most laudable proposition. However, it is stated that the treaty bans (verifiable) nuclear explosions only and nothing more. Therefore, there is nothing to worry about. Furthermore, in Pakistan, most of those who favour signing the CTBT immediately, had earlier on claimed that with the state of nuclear weapons' development in the country in October 1998, a physical explosion of a device was not necessary to ensure it would work and provide the expected results. Taken together, it would mean that any country, whether it has signed NPT/CTBT etc. or not, could still surreptitiously develop a credible nuclear weapons capability and make the system as highly sophisticated as the state of that country's scientific and technological development would support. That being the case, then in fact, CTBT does not contribute anything towards the cause of nuclear non-proliferation. Why then all this huge effort, expense and fuss by three of 'the five self proclaimed' Nuclear Weapon States to promote NPT / CTBT etc.? The rest of the countries at UN having tagged along for reasons we in Pakistan are well familiar with.
    
    If the treaty is designed to be the first real step towards elimination of nuclear weapons throughout the world, then, nothing could be better than it. However, three things do create some doubts. The desire to continue with the 'rights and privileges' of the existing exclusive nuclear weapons club of five. The right to continue with simulated weapons testing, which because of the sophistication available in that field virtually amounts to real testing. A capability that perhaps only the five plus two (Japan and Germany) possess and elements of which are most likely being passed on to India right now under various economic, scientific and technological co-operation agreements. The permission granted to 'the Five' to exchange information in nuclear weapons' field amongst themselves, while denying the same facility to others e.g. even between India and Israel or North Korea. In reality, if the past were any guide, it means exchange of information between NATO nuclear weapon states only. In the future, there could be droppings for Russia too, just to keep her amused till the unbearable weight of nuclear super-structure brings itself or the whole house down.
    
    Despite these advantages and many others, the decision at the Capitol Hill not to ratify CTBT should make our thinkers, planners and decision-makers alike ask themselves; "Why the hesitancy?" What worries the high and mighty, should not the same be at least of some concern to newcomers in the field. India is doing just that. Those in a hurry to sign CTBT before Pakistan is 'granted' the status of Nuclear Weapon State in the hope that later, if India obtains better terms and conditions, Pakistan need not ratify the treaty in the manner of the US Legislators, I ask," If today, under the pressure or compulsion of economic difficulties, or with the idea of gaining some undefined temporary economic cum military benefits and a moral victory over India, whatever that means in the present day jungle world, we are prepared to sign CTBT. What is there to ensure that under similar or worse circumstances later, we would not succumb to similar pressures, compulsions or temptations of further undefined gains?" For those who have decided to live for today only and do not care to think of a tomorrow with self-respect and honour, and for those who do not aspire for the higher, and prepared to make sacrifices for it, I admit that reading this letter must have been a waste of time. But, please, let hurry not create a greater worry later, particularly for our children in the manner our elders have left for us. If in the case of India the world can wait for elections and induction of a new government to and give it time to build up a consensus in the country, surely the same considerations cannot be denied to Pakistan.
    
    Iqbal F Quadir
    Vice Admiral PN (Retd)
    Pakistan
    
    
    
48. As a Pakistani by birth, I like Pakistan not to sign the CTBT agreement as it will close the option for Pakistan to research and develop in the nuclear field. Nuclear power is the way to achieve prosperity. Also being next to a hostile neighbour like India, I think there should not be any compromise on country's integrity.
    
    Shahid Khan
    USA
    
    
    
49. Pakistan should never sign the CTBT. So far this is the only thing we could be proud of. If we give up, we will lose whatever respect we have in the world.
    
    Hashim Khan
    Pakistan
    
    
    
50. I do not agree to signing on CTBT because it will allow foreign govts. to interfere in our nuclear programme. India will not care. But we will be bound.
    
    Farhat Tanweer
    USA
    
    
    
51. I believe it is very difficult for general public to tell if Pakistan should sign the CTBT or not. If our scientists feel that we have acquired the required skill needed to counter any Indian aggression then there is no point in letting linger the signing of CTBT. We should also see it from the political point of view and from the international perspective; try to relate it to the points which could bring dignity and honour in the international views for the country.
    
    Syed Tarique Niaz
    Kuwait
    
    
    
52. In 1945 the USA was the only nation possessing the atom bomb. If Japan had also had the bomb then the Americans would not have even dreamt of using it. It is for this very reason that Pakistan should never compromise on the nuclear issue and must not sign the CTBT. For those who think Pakistan is a failed state, I can only ask, "How many failed states can you name which manufacture nuclear weapons?" And finally a word on Indian megalomaniacs: The last millennium witnessed the demise of many strong empires like the Ottomon, the British and the Soviet. By comparison, the Indian Union is not even peanuts! The creation of Pakistan and later Bangladesh is all part of the gradual dismemberment of India. The liberation of Kashmir will be sooner than most Indians realise.
    
    Tasawwar Jaffri
    Glasgow, UK
    
    
    
53. Pakistan should not sign the CTBT. There is no need to sign it. Being a responsible nation, we should test the nuclear devices when absolutely necessary. And this is to 'protect the environment'. Pakistan must test and upgrade its capabilities only to 'protect the environment. Just imagine how Japanese could have protected the environment of Hiroshima and Nagasaki by testing a few small devices underground.
    
    Also for our austerity drive we do not need to send delegations and spend money for such a useless thing. Don't you think that the UN is enough for us, for doing this? We don't have lots of scientists who should be 'facilitating and clarifying' on issues of CTBT; let them do important things, that are important for Pakistan. The parties that are pressurising Pakistan to sign should first convince us of the benefits of the treaties which we had signed earlier. I hear some harsh voices from the other side of the border, could you screen them just to allow those who remain within civilised limits? This forum should remain for healthy debate. We respect others right of patriotism but...
    
    Mohammad Anar
    Pakistani/UAE
    
    
    
54. I am an Indian and giving my opinion in "the international perspective" - assuming that we are two countries on the other side of the globe and not assuming the current relationship - or rather the lack thereof - between the two countries. The CTBT is a mechanism to freeze all countries on the nuclear learning curve. Please don't see it in isolation but in relationship with NPT. Today, France and US, being members of the "Nuclear Club" can share test data. We can't go to US/France and buy that data. So it is basically the knowledge squeeze that is paramount and nothing else. So the question is: what "legitimises" some five countries to possess Nuclear arsenal and not us. What is "so great" about them? The testing per se: CTBT does not ban "all" testing. It only bans "critical" testing. Sub-critical and "non-fission fusion" are allowed. (Strictly speaking, of the five tests India did, THREE were outside the purview of CTBT). Now this allows countries "beyond the band-gap of knowledge" to continue testing and perfecting sub-critical weapons whereas lesser countries that have not perfected their knowledge by tests to be unable to do such tests. (I must add that this works both ways, (as one school of thought goes) even Iraq can develop and test sub-critical weapons and use computer simulations to build the bomb. Whether that will go off is anybody's guess. This school believes that one does not need to have actual test data to design sub-critical weapons anymore). Barring this counter argument, allowing sub-critical weapons is a gadget by N5 to have the cake and eat it too.
    
    Pure fusion or non-fission fusion is another toy. This is also outside the scope of CTBT.
    Furthermore, signing a treaty is an act of volition. One cannot be forced into it either via economic or any other means. These make the CTBT, like the holy Roman Empire, neither comprehensive nor a ban and far from being a treaty.
    
    Siddhartha Sen
    India (currently in US)
    
    
    
55. Pakistan should not tie itself to India for signing the CTBT. We are an independent country and we should be able to make decisions, which are good for our country. The United States, which presented this document, has not signed it and its congress has declared it to be dangerous for the country. I think Pakistan should not sign until the United States and all other nuclear countries sign.
    
    Shahrukh
    USA
    
    
    
56. Pakistan should sign the CTBT and look towards improvement of the lives of her citizens and also find mechanisms of living decently like a civilised nation rather than going ahead with development of nuclear weapons. My advice to Pakistan is forget nuclear weapons, sign CTBT, forget Kashmir, let we Indians live peacefully and live as good neighbours and hand over Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir.
    
    Uzma Ahmed
    Bombay, India
    
    
    
57. Pakistan should never sign the CTBT, even if India does. We should see our own interests and make our own decisions entirely independent of all others things such as the visit of any country's President. I advice Gen. Pervez not to sign it only because then Clinton will visit Pakistan and his government will be internationally recognised. It will ever be a great "Blunder". Die decision about CTBT should be taken for our national interests and it should have no attachment to any other thing than our "SALMIYYAT".
    
    Rashid Nawaz
    Germany
    
    
    
58. Whether we say or no, General Musharaf will do whatever he wants. If he wants to sign CTBT, he is not going to listen to anyone. Because he is a Military man, not a political leader. He doesn’t know how to run the country. A few months ago the USA and Western countries were offering so much help to Pakistan for signing the CTBT, but he did not agree. But now there is not too much pressure to sign the CTBT. But the government is aggressive to sign; in my opinion this time is not suitable to sign. Let Democracy come, that will decide, not the military government.
    
    Chin Yun Chao
    Montreal, Canada
    
    
    
59. I discussed the CTBT with Pakistani, Indian, African, European, Arab, Chinese and even Jewish/Israeli, Irish, British, Russian, South American and American colleagues, co-workers, friends and people in different capacities. We discussed the CTBT and what comes after it and what comes out of it (signing) is different for each country.
    Everybody has a general view that Nuclear as well as conventional weapons are causing suffering and poverty and are a barrier to the prosperity of all the nations. Everybody agrees that there is injustice, in the attitudes of UNO and big powers that make other nations to maintain their military and/or nuclear defence. Everybody agrees that CTBT if signed by big powers is a useless commitment and if signed by under-developed countries will sooner or later put them in IRAQI-SITUATION.
    
    My view is that Pakistan and India both should avoid signing the CTBT or be ready to become IRAQ-KUWAIT in the near future, the flexible, multifaceted plan which some professor and Anglo-American intelligence would already have prepared and even be busy implementing it in the coming years. Kashmir-an evil-genius suppository inserted by the British is a challenge to the politicians and generals of India and Pakistan to get rid of, but, even thereafter NO TO CTBT as it's merely a blackmailing which will carry on.
    
    Dr.Shahid Amin
    JHB-South Africa
    
    
    
60. Pakistan should not sign the CTBT, because Pakistan like other nations reserves the right to protect itself from any threat. Secondly, it is for the cause of Kashmir that this nuclear option has enabled Pakistan to voice the issue internationally and has been successful in getting the right response from Washington.
    
    Farrukh M. Sharif
    Pakistan
    
    
    
61. I believe that signing the CTBT or not signing it all depends upon the attitude of the superpowers. Pakistan's nuclear capability under no circumstances can endanger the world peace. Instead its the nuclear capabilities of the superpowers and particularly of the USA that are utmost dangerous for the whole world. It's Yankee's who dropped the atom bomb upon Japan and killed thousands of innocent peoples and left many to suffer this cruelty for 50 years. It's much better that the Americans sign the CTBT first. Not only this, they must also destroy all the nuclear arsenals to set an example. After this there is no harm for Pakistan or any other country in signing CTBT. Otherwise it's totally blackmail and unfair behaviour towards other countries, including Pakistan, and for that we must resist, for we have the right to maintain our nuclear capability.
    
    Ibrahim Raja
    Sweden
    
    
    
62. I strongly believe that signing or not signing the CTBT, has no relevance to the nuclear restraint that is essential (in the interest of human civilisation). Many of us are either supporting or passively accepting, nuclear weapons. I strongly believe that such an irresponsible tendency is mainly because many of us have not witnessed, or are not aware of, the nuclear holocaust and it ills that such an event can bring to the entire human race. Do we know if the radioactive content left behind (and carried around the globe by the complex wind currents) after the Hiroshima-Nagasaki nuclear bombs and the hundreds of nuclear tests (although tester proclaim them to be successes and contained) have affected, not just the humans but all the creatures which, unfortunately, share the earth with such an irresponsible, inconsiderate lot, often referred to as humans?
    
    I strongly believe and support what I call as "human maturity." Obviously, this is a global phenomenon. CTBT, in a more refined form, should eventually lead to the more important, and oft forgotten, "global disarmament". This could happen only if "Global Harmony" comes into existence. I don't see many societies around the world supporting harmony. The concept of "live and let live" is being forgotten, and the concept of "kill before death" is gaining popularity. First, we should accept (as a responsible, thinking and considerate race) differences of opinions. No one necessarily has to agree with an opinion that is not shared by him/her, but at least should understand and practice restraint.
    
    I would like to quote the following:
    "Seven blunders of the world that lead to violence:
    1. Wealth without work
    2. Pleasure without conscience
    3. Knowledge without character
    4. Commerce without morality
    5. Science without humanity
    6. Worship without sacrifice
    7. Politics without principle"
    -Mahatma Gandhi (1869-1948)
    
    "Truth is a shining goddess, always veiled, always distant, never wholly approachable, but worthy of all the devotion of which the human spirit is capable."
    -Bertrand Russell (1872-1970)
    
    Let us help develop the "human spirit" and its capabilities. Let's be honest and work towards making global peace and harmony, a practical phenomenon (that is as practical as is the nuclear warheads of today).
    
    Viswanathan Kapaleeswaran
    Australia, Indian
    
    
    
63. We should not sign the CTBT before India does.
    
    Abbas Raza Zaidi
    USA
    
    
    
64. We should go ahead and sign the CTBT. What a great country Pakistan is when exactly 52 years ago, its engineers envisioned its existence in the world community, and its role as the largest independent Muslim state in the world forum. Now after all these years, should each and every single countryman ask himself/herself a fair question, that where we stand today, and what would happen to this country after 20 more years, when a whole new generation will be ready to enter the arena, and will ask, what is my sin, why should I suffer all this. Will we be able to answer this question? Through this forum, I am going to address all the corrupt leaders of Pakistan, who feel proud to call themselves Pakistani leaders. Please for God's sake, for whom do you pray five times a day, for whom you fast 30 days, every year. Please leave this country alone. Look at India, look at Bangladesh, where are they today, today we are begging and crying that the President of the Untied States is not visiting our country, whose tenor has been left only for nine more months. Does it show we are self- respected nation?
    
    Naushad Alawani'
    Florida, USA
    
    
    
65. I think that Pakistan should sign the CTBT with certain safeguards. This will not cripple our ability to conduct any kind of experiment in case of any breach of agreement from the other side. Instead Pakistan should seek more concessions like foreign debts etc. which we could not cash at the end of Afghan crisis. We fought as a frontline nation to curb Russians in Afghanistan and eventually paving the way for Independence of so many countries out of USSR. So, like Israelis, Turks and Egyptians got their loans waved-off for helping the West against Saddam, we should also be given some break. So there is no harm in signing CTBT, but America and other Western nations should compensate us for that.
    
    Shaukat Chauhan
    New York, USA
    
    
    
66. I would like to request the government of Pakistan that the CTBT should not be signed at any cost. If the western powers have full right to make and sell the atomic then why not Pakistan. India can never be friends with Pakistan and she is always thinking to put Pakistanis into boiling water. Please don't sign the CTBT at any cost.
    
    Muhammad Maitla
    Oklahoma state, USA
    
    
    
67. The opinion given by Praveen from India made me laugh. She/He is talking about Pakistan being stuck in a time warp for 50 years. She/He should ask this after she visits the streets of Calcutta and Mumbai and then come and visit the cities of Karachi and Lahore. She/He will know the meaning of time warp. As far as having a referendum in Pakistan is concerned, it's Kashmirs who want freedom; it's Manipur State which asks for freedom; it's Assam which is begging for freedom; it's is the Sikhs who want freedom and sooner or later the rest of the Indians Muslims will be begging to get out of the so-called democratic country you call India.
    
    Azhar Hussain
    USA
    
    
    
68. I think Pakistan should sign the CTBT and should start working on its economic development. Pakistan has some serious issues at home- issues like corruption and poverty to name a few and it should stop worrying about India and Kashmir. Pakistan should work on more important issues like dealing with poverty, modernisation and educating its masses. Pakistan should sign the CTBT, stop spreading terrorism, in Kashmir, Chechnya, Dagestan and all around the world, live peacefully and I can be sure India will not bother Pakistan, as India is a peace-loving country.
    
    Mohammed Kasim
    India
    
    
    
69. The answer to the question should be emphatically and categorically NO without any kind of reservations. It has to be clear that this US-driven agenda has nothing to do except leaving the only Islamic country possessing nuclear technology defenceless. The main and the only reason for signing CTBT is to remove this threat. The hypocrisy is at the highest level since the US itself declared not to sign it and of course the long rival Israel. My other colleagues have mentioned numerable excellent reasons of not signing the treaty. My only contention is that it is the fear of a Muslim nation having this technology that has created this fear. This is the only deterrent we have and we should exploit it.
    
    Dr. Khalid Loan
    Pakistan
    
    
    
70. Pakistan should not sign the CTBT before India does it first.
    
    Arshed Khan
    Oslo Norway
    
    
    
71. Signing the CTBT is a very sensitive issue. In plain words the Pakistani nation whether living within or away from Pakistan will not welcome a decision of signing the CTBT unless it's simultaneously signed by India as well.
    
    Shaikh M. Ahmad
    Saudi Arabia
    
    
    
72. Digressing from the question, Praveen has spewed venom against Pakistan and the Muslims. The author's ideas represent the insular thinking of the majority community of India. First Praveen brags that Indians have made a mark in the world and that they are first class professionals. The author is living in his own world of wishful thinking. If the author had any knowledge of the professional excellence of Pakistanis, he would not have made such a claim. Pakistani professionals match with those of India and their achievements are no less than those of the Indians. Praveen wants Pakistan to sign CTBT and throw away its nuclear weapons. As an Indian, he should have given this advice first to India since India exploded the nuclear device 26 years ago. Does he think that India has some special status to have the right to possess nuclear weapons? I may mention here that India made the atom bomb to use against Pakistan and not against its neighbours. When Pakistan acquired nuclear capability, Indians felt that Pakistan could not be overpowered. Pakistan has repeatedly told that it will sign the CTBT if India signs it. Pakistan's stand is based on reason and fairness.
    
    Praveen has demanded that since the Hindus remained under the Muslim rule for 1000 years, Muslims should now accept Hindu rule. If the Hindus accepted the rule of Muslims it was their decision, why should Muslims submit themselves to Hindu rule? Praveen did not know the implication of what he said. He has accepted that India is a Hindu state and Pakistanis and Muslims should accept Hindu India's rule. Now he should not say that India is a secular state. Another conclusion from his letter is that Kashmiris have accepted Hindu rule and, hence, this state is part of India. Let us see how long the Indian occupation of Kashmir continues.
    
    Mukhtar Ali Naqvi
    USA
    
    
    
73. We should not sign the CTBT. The nuclear bomb has given great importance to Pakistan, without which, the West considers Pakistan a failed state and forgets it. They will pay attention till we have not signed the CTBT. Once we sign, the game is over. Also it gives great pride and determination to defend the country. It is foolish to think that once sanctions are removed the economic conditions are going to be improved. Pakistan had been junior partner of the western world. Sure, America has helped us a lot but self help is the most important thing needed. Intolerance, corruption, feudal mentality and spineless judiciary have destroyed the country. It is fashion to blame sanctions as the reason for every evil existing in Pakistan. There are many so-called specialists in our country who only look forward to favours from the US. The US has already degraded Pakistan, though it does not say it openly. Nuclear capacity is important to all nations. Why the US, Russia, China and others want nuclear weapons? Unfortunately power counts and nuclear weapons count. In the Afghan war, the US destroyed peace and tranquillity of Pakistan, gave few billion dollars and left us with drugs, guns and lawless people. What did we get by following western advice? If we blindly follow and sign the CTBT, the same thing is bound to happen. History has a funny way of repeating for fools.
    
    Mo Karachiwala
    USA
    
    
    
74. Pakistan should insist on resolution of Kashmir issue to the satisfaction of all parties as a condition to signing CTBT. At this time this is the only card she has left to play and Kashmir is the biggest conflict which could lead to additional confrontation in the area. This should be the effort USA should be able to make for this demand.
    
    Mohammad Khalid
    Dallas,Texas
    
    
    
75. There are a lot of Pakistanis who say that to gain some sort of a positive image and at the same time bargain for "goodies" with the USA, Pakistan should sign the CTBT and that too before India does. This would put a lot of international pressure on India too. Pakistan has been a US ally for too long, but has got no rewards whatsoever. The USA is therefore under no "pressure" or obligation to reward Pakistan in any way, even if it signs the CTBT. It has all the trump cards. Pakistan has none. India, on the other hand, has never cared for any international pressure. It carried out the May 98 tests without giving a damn for anyone. Historically too, the world has either been soft towards India or had little leverage with it. So it may or may not sign the CTBT depending on its own whims. Actually, this is a no-win situation for Pakistan. It will be sorry if it signs the CTBT and damned if it doesn't. In my opinion, this is linked directly to the international isolation that Pakistan is facing currently as well as its economic mismanagement. Nevertheless, the price to pay would be higher if Pakistan doesn't sign the CTBT. It has to choose between the lesser evil amongst the two.
    
    Bhuvanesh Patel
    New York, USA
    
    
    
76. No. Never ever should Pakistan make this BLUNDER, because TUMARI DASTAN TAK NAA HOGI DASTANO MAIN
    
    Choudhry. A
    USA
    
    
    
77. Why Pakistan "must not" sign the CTBT:
    1) Signing the CTBT means "we will also sign the FMCT and NPT". That obviously raises a lot of concern for our nation especially the security and integrity concern. Dear fellow countrymen, come out of the logic of benefits by signing before or after India does so. Remember, the signing of CTBT will eventually invoke the "inspection-game". Then what will stop us to be treated like "Iraq" inspection exercise? Will they believe because we sign CTBT before India? Never.
    
    2) Can we become "good guy" ever in the eyes of the west (so that we may get the fair so-called economic benefits)? YES, if we forego everything that relates us to Islam (even names like Ehmad Rentoyuff won't help us from being massacred). Are our eyes closed? How does it happen in East-Timor but not in Kashmir, Chechnya, Moro, Philippine. Let us realise who we are and then try to re-build our nation, each of
    us in his/her capacity.
    
    3) By not signing the CTBT we will at least have deterrence against our "hypothetical aggressor". Let us build friendly relations with every country based on the principles of equality and sovereignty. Being economic slave does not imply that we go for "ideological slavery" too. Instead it is to be the reverse process. Let us begin this journey from ideological independence to the economic independence by staying away from CTBTers' ulterior motives.
    
    Qudrat-ullah Hassan
    Singapore
    
    
    
78. We should WAIT...I know that CTBT will not affect Pakistan's nuclear installations but still we need to adopt a clear approach towards India's nuclear thinking because believe it or not, it directly affects us. If the American Senate can adopt a policy of "wait and decide" then why can't we? There wouldn't be any immediate "benefits" from signing CTBT now so why not wait... for some appropriate time.
    
    Adeel Bhutta
    Wazirabad, Pakistan
    
    
    
79. I have only one question: There is a clause in CTBT, which states that if two-third majority of CTBT club members vote to open your nuclear facilities you have to open it for their inspection. In Nuclear club, Pakistan is the only Muslim country. It is for sure that Pakistani facilities can easily be asked for inspection while Pakistan can not ask the same for INDIA or any other country.
    
    Humayun Akhtar
    Lahore
    
    
    
80. By signing the CTBT, Pakistan can earn the respect of the entire world and all her past, present and future sins will be forgiven. It can continue to promote Islamic terrorism. It will be good for General Musharraf as the world will sing his praises and give legitimacy to his regime. A grateful United States will allow his regime to continue forever. People will forget about Nawaz Sharif's fate. Follow China's example- China fools the entire world that it abides by Non-Proliferation Treaty and yet clandestinely supplies nuclear materials to Pakistan. In the same manner, Pakistan can also sign the CTBT on paper, and let Abdul Qadeer Khan secretly pursue the nuclear weapons programme. Pakistan's propaganda machine is world-renowned. So even if Pakistan violates the treaty, it can flatly deny it and accuse India instead and call the world's attention to the suffering of Muslims in Kashmir.
    So there is absolutely nothing to lose by signing the CTBT if you are not going to abide by it. It is really comic that there should be so much hesitation.
    
    Srinivasa Raghavan
    Madras, India
    
    
    
81. The CTBT is a big issue nowadays, but it is our bad luck that our politicians never did a sincere discussion on national issues. I have a very straightforward concept and it is not mine but Islamic, that Muslims are not to follow others but they are born to lead. So we should do what is better for us. Whether India accepts CTBT or not, is not our problem. We need to see if signing CTBT affects our freedom, whether it is better for our improvement or not. The decision is very simple: the main example is America, it is improving its atomic technology day by day, no compromise can stop it and no doubt it is good for Americans. So I shall say please make your own decision don't follow others, because being a Muslim your decision will be good for the nation and for the Muslims all over the world (I am dead sure).
    
    Syed Habib Bukhari
    Dubai, UAE
    
    
    
82. I think Pakistan should not sign the CTBT unless the Kashmir problem is solved. Even after that, first India has to sign it, because India initiates every problem.
    
    Salmana Ahmed
    Toronto, Canada
    
    
    
83. Pakistan should not sign the CTBT if India refuses to do so. Only, in case, both the countries should sign it together. Because when Pakistan acquired in 1962 the very first atomic reactor (KENOP) and operated it, the entire western world, including the USA, opposed it and put embargo on economic and military aid. But during the same period India openly acquired atomic fuel, reactors and capabilities and detonated its first nuclear bomb in May 1974 (which I personally reported in Jan.1974 and the story was carried out by Pakistani and foreign press). However neither the west Europe nor the USA showed any concern about it. But again in 1999 when India detonated its second atomic experimental arsenals no hue and cry was there. Again when Pakistan in response to that detonation and to secure its defence, did the atomic detonation these countries reacted sharply. If Pakistan signs the CTBT without India being signatory then the results are inevitable. India will use this technology against Pakistan in a bid to lay its hegemony and, being a signatory to CTBT, Pakistan would be left in a lurch. I am sure that most of the Pakistanis as also Gen. Pervez Musharraf will agree with me that the West, especially the USA, has its own interests and would not help Pakistan in anyway. The 1965 and 1971 wars were enough proof and evidence to this fact. If in spite of this, the Pakistani leadership wants to sign, for their own political or personal benefits, then it would be in the best of their interests and not in the interest of the nation and country.
    
    Habib Hayat
    USA/UK/M.E.
    
    
    
84. Pakistan's security must not be compromised. If signing the CTBT will not affect our capability to enhance nuclear arsenal, why is the US so hell bent on getting it signed? We all very well know that the suppresser always comes up with interpretations of agreements vastly different from the suppressed. We have with us examples of India on Kashmir, Israel on Palestine, etc. We must therefore avoid falling into such traps.
    
    Jawaid A. Qureshi
    Saudi Arabia
    
    
    
85. The CTBT must not be signed unless the flushing issue of Kashmir is resolved. The major atomic countries- China, UK, France, USA and USSR- have not yet signed the CTBT and Pakistan has to watch and see the result after these major atomic powers sign.
    
    Mohammad Manzar Husain
    USA
    
    
    
86. There seems to be a lot of debate at present about the CTBT. I have the following points to put forward:
    1. Theoretically, a world without any nuclear weapons is a safer world. However given that, a lot of countries possess such weapons, who are we trying to kid by signing such a treaty? Does signing treaties prevent someone from going to war? In today's marketplace, even if you don't have perfected the technology, you can always go out and buy it. So why test? Pakistan has done this really well with all its 'Made in China / North Korea' type weapons.
    
    2. A lot of readers who have responded so far talk about the threat from India and therefore the necessity to maintain a nuclear arsenal. Is it not the most colossal waste in the world when two poor countries are spending money on arms when they should be buying books and medicines instead? But unfortunately, the hate multiplies and the kettle will boil over again it seems.
    
    3. The real issue here is the hate mongering that Pakistan is spreading. Remember, the world community does not really give a damn about both India and Pakistan. But if it came to the crunch, it would not be hard to figure out who will be supported. You Pakistanis delude yourself that you will get Kashmir back and achieve some sort of revenge for 1971. It is simply not going to happen. India is a passive country but knows how to fight when awoken. History should have taught you that.
    
    4. CTBT or not, till Pakistanis realise that Kashmir is going to stay with India forever and also that the average Indian wants to live in peace, it will be forced to spend money on arms ( 60% of its GDP) and never progress. To summarise, Pakistan is a country in reverse gear with its foot firmly on the accelerator. India varies between neutral and first gear, with gentle taps on the accelerator as it goes along. The gap therefore widens for all
    to see.
    
    Rahul Sood
    Chicago
    
    
    
87. It's nice to go to bed knowing there are no nuclear weapons in this world. I hope the world pays more attention to eliminating them. The US has no moral right to ask anybody to sign the CTBT for its own senate rejected it. I think India and Pakistan should stop fighting like school children. They would do well to work on their own problems.
    
    Kumar
    USA
    
    
    
88. I think Pakistan better sign the CTBT or the tin-pot-dictator-led-terrorist-state will not get anything from the IMF. Then, mullahs would mean more Jihad. And infidels like myself would truly get upset. Oh, what an inferiority complex you Pakistanis have! Who's had the last laugh? The Jinnah or the Mahatma. Obviously the Mahtama!
    
    Tammy S. Eliot
    USA
    
    
    
89. After the Second World War's calamity where America was on the top of list, devastated Japan, the World was talking about peace, a universal body, to look-after the global political, social and other issues. Today, after more than 50 years of UNO foundation, every small nation feels that UNO is still serving and protecting the interests of the same powers who were actively involved in Word War II. America is still on top of the list using the shelter of UNO in achieving its full benefits to be the only Policeman. All the agreements, pacts are only for small nations not for super powers. The World has double standards. The other serious questions are that if there is any recognition of the genuine issues of smaller countries like Pakistan. Does America recognise and accept Pakistan's genuine complaints on its territorial issues including Kashmir? If not, then who is going to provide the guarantee that there will not be any further pressure on Pakistan to accept other treaties such as the FMCT and NPT? And in reply, what will Pakistan get - nothing. Pakistan has already had many bad experiences from America, in the past. America never supported Pakistan's grumbles openly. Before thinking of signing the CTBT, Pakistan must analyse what sort of benefits Pakistan would get and up to what extent the problems would be solved. The people of Pakistan and the Government of Pakistan must understand that "Your only friend is your own sincerity and loyalty to the country". Pakistan should never sign any international agreements including CTBT before the peaceful settlement of the Kashmir issue.
    
    Syed Atiq ul Hassan
    Sydney Australia
    
    
    
90. The only countries that are signing it are the ones who do not have nuclear weapons now or have no capabilities to produce them in the near future. The countries with nuclear weapons like the US are not signing it. Why should India and Pakistan sign it? A bad law can be repealed quickly; a treaty (good or bad) you live with forever. The US has been testing its weapons for the last 60 years and still does not feel comfortable that it has all the data because the technology is likely to change in the near future; then why should Pakistan/India feel comfortable that they do not need any further testing? Seems like the US never feels itself secure; insecurity is just American mindset. If the US cheats, there is not much India/Pakistan can do; if Pakistan or India cheats, then the US and UK are going to raise all sorts of hell, and impose all kinds of sanctions. Why give them any excuse? Only India has to take care of Indian security. Only Pakistan has to take care of Pakistani security. The US is not going to provide any security (at least not free and not without strings). Trusting the US is fatal. SAY NO TO CTBT.
    
    Romesh Chander
    Washington(DC), USA
    
    
    
91. Three words only- NOT AT ALL.
    
    Mazhar Hussain
    USA
    
    
    
92. Pakistan should not sign the CTBT even if India signed or the USA Congress passed the bill of non-proliferation. The present tension at the line of control, is a strong message for Pakistani nation to open their eyes. This is the only issue on which the whole nation is together and united. General Pervez Musharraf has not any authority to sign the CTBT. Don't test the nation, do your routine business and go back to barracks. The same comments on all political parties like, rejected PPP rejected Muslim league and other small parties. Pakistan Zindabad.
    
    Syed Ejaz Akbar Jaffri
    USA
    
    
    
93. The CTBT is a very delicate issue that has to be dealt with carefully. Under the existing regional security circumstances Pakistan should not sign the CTBT for many reasons. We have to recognise our long-term interests vs the short-term gains, especially given the changing geo-political situation of the region. Though signing the treaty does not mean that Pakistan will have to forgo its nuclear program, or will not be able to test nuclear weapons if India chooses to do so, it does mean that future pressure will be put on Pakistan to accept other treaties such as the FMCT and NPT.
    
    Pakistan has to recognise that if today it signs the CTBT it might win some economic or diplomatic benefits, tomorrow the US will be pressurising Pakistan to sign other treaties that lead to an eventual de-nuclearisation. The US has been quite clear about its policy in this regard. On the other hand the US has clearly made a policy shift in favour of India and is willing to accept India's policy of minimum nuclear deterrence. The US wishes to use India as its puppet against China in the region, a role India is more than willing to perform so long as it furthers their false dreams of becoming a super power. Under these circumstances Pakistan must do all to safeguard its security and not succumb to blackmail.
    
    Though the CTBT is now a paper tiger since the US lost its credibility after its senate rejected the treaty, it's what the treaty means for Pakistan in the long run that counts. It's clearly an attempt to put Pakistan into a position where it can be further pressurised to de-nuclearise while India is accepted as a nuclear power. It must be made clear that Pakistan will not accept Indian hegemony in the region and resist all attempts by India and others to avail it that position. Pakistan must take a tougher stand on the issue and demand from not only India but also from the US that certain credible guarantees be made, while outlining clearly that Pakistan would withdraw from the treaty immediately if any of its requirements are not met or violated. As things are, it appears that the US is willing to dance to India's tune for its signature on the CTBT, Pakistan should make it clear that doing so will not bring Pakistan closer to the CTBT but increase its determination in acquiring nuclear weapons.
    
    Ali Mian
    Canada
    
    
    
94. I think the CTBT is nothing and Pakistan has the right not to sign anything like the CTBT; we can alive with the Atomic power and continue atomic experiments.
    
    Sabih ul Islam Farooqui
    Karachi, Pakistan
    
    
    
95. Pakistan should sign the CTBT immediately.
    Reasons:
    1) Pakistan possesses simple fission nuclear bombs which do not need further testing. They are similar to the bombs used in Hiroshima and Nagasaki which were never tested.
    
    2) Pakistan has no intentions or means (more important) to develop boosted fission bombs and thermonuclear bombs, which require extensive if not open-ended testing.
    
    3) Pakistan's nuclear policy is India-specific and so we do not need sophisticated nuclear bombs. We already have around 30 bombs and the MEANS to deliver them anywhere in India which should be sufficient to deter them from unleashing nuclear attacks on Pakistan if not conventional attack or LIMITED war strategy recently adopted by India.
    
    4) Pakistan does not possess enough weapons grade uranium needed to go for an open-ended testing of nuclear bombs for the sake of 'patriotic' rhetoric.
    
    5) Signing the CTBT will leave India alone subject to international pressures which may give a diplomatic edge to Pakistan.
    
    6) India may need to deter west and the USA against any Yugoslavian model attack on the issue of ethnic cleansing in Kashmir and so it desperately needs ICBM and sophisticated war heads. GSLV when converted to ICBM will turn out to be a major one with a range of 14000 Kms PSLV with 8000Kms. India already possesses re-entry vehicle technology mastered in Agni-II. Space launch vehicles when programmed with a trajectory of ballistic missiles with satellite payload being replaced with nuclear warhead integrated with re-entry technology results in an ICBM. This is what India is exactly going to do. Their planned SURYA ICBM is going to be made exactly like this. After 1 or 2 test flights of SURYA India will conduct around 5 nuclear tests to establish a well proven thermonuclear capability. So India will NEVER sign the CTBT which will leave them against the wall for next 5 years if Pakistan signs now.
    
    7) Signing the CTBT before India will definitely result in some economic relaxation.
    
    8) India will definitely go for 14000 kms range ICBMs and sophisticated nuclear warheads so they NEED to test again. This will make them a bad guy. Pakistan should not go for matching missile to missile and bomb to bomb. Just maintain a minimum credible deterrent which we very much possess even now- so no need for further testing.
    
    I urge that moronic comments from Maulana Azhar types who know next to nothing about nuclear science and strategies should be banned. He is a fundamentalist who thinks that signing CTBT is synonymous to performing genuflect before 'Kafirs'. I sincerely request him to refrain from making Pakistan and himself a laughing stock of the world. Pakistan Paindabad!
    
    Ahmar Khan Durrani
    Karachi, Pakistan
    
    
    
96. CTBT stands for Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty as you all know. The only non-adherents to this treaty are India and Pakistan among the notable ones and many non-notable countries. The CTBT was designed to prevent the explosion of nuclear fission and fusion devices below 1 KT(kilo ton).
    
    Now lets analyse the pros and cons. It was framed to stop the repeated explosions of underground/undersea devices by the advanced countries. Perhaps because of the damage being done to the environment. But I believe for other reasons. The advanced countries have exploded such devices hundreds of times and got actual data to fashion their weapons like Minuteman, trident, SS Silos etc. The Question before us is:
    
    1) Do you possess enough data to fashion a weapon with just 5-6 blasts? Is it enough?
    2) Contrary to what our scientists claim, if 5-6 blasts were sufficient to simulate sub-critical tests then why the West did not go in for such computer simulation?
    3) The CTBT is just a starting point, what follows are NPT, FMCT and MTCR. What about these? Can any self-respecting country adhere to these?
    4) Joining the CTBT at the same time just means that the country promises not to conduct future tests and nothing more. Then how do you validate your weapon and the yield? Putting such a constraint is like giving an F-16 plane but no bombs and fuel. Then what use is such a plane...map this scenario to atomic weapons.
    5) The US itself has not ratified the treaty. Prudence advises us to have them sign it first, for let's not forget that it was the US which conducted the maximum number of explosions.
    6) Of course, joining the CTBT would earn the country lavish praise from the West, and perhaps more dollar aid but WILL IT REALLY HELP THE CAUSE OF THE COUNTRY?
    7) Above all let's remember that if India and Pakistan do not want to become another Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Sudan, Afghanistan then the only hope is nuclear deterrent. This is the only hope against the world's super cop. We see a living example of this theory in Russia. The US has dared not to do anything to Russia because of the immense nuclear forces that Russia has.
    
    8) From the environmental perspective, I fully agree that all countries should join the CTBT. We just cannot go on damaging the environment and jeopardising it for our future generations. That would be criminal. So, let's ponder over all these points before we take a decision. Of course, the benefits are immense by adhering to the treaty... But the flip side is also very dark.
    
    Arun.R
    India
    
    
    
97. Pakistan should sign the treaty on the condition to reserve the right in case India restarts testing.
    
    Mumtaz Ahmed
    Pakistan
    
    
    
98. Pakistan is stuck in the time warp for 50 years now. Countries have picked up and moved. India, in spite of its poverty and problems, has made a mark in this world. Ask a world citizen about India, he would say, Indians are world class engineers, doctors, artistes, scientists, spiritualists and innovators. India has made its mark in the IT industry and has started counting the billions it is raking in.
    
    Now look at Pakistan, first thing, give up that wishful thinking of wanting Kashmir. Sign that CTBT and throw your nuclear weapons into the ocean. Stop killing each other. Pakistan is in the business of hating India so much, that Pakistan has begun to hate herself. No wonder, there are begging bowls all over. And, WITH THE ARMY TAKING OVER, IT'S A COUP ON EACH AND EVERY PAKISTANI CITIZEN'S LIFE. When are the Pakistanis gonna get serious? Also, Pakistan does not want Hindus to rule Muslims. (That simply is not the case with India). Do they now realise how the Hindus felt when the Muslim invaders came to India a 1000 years ago, a result of which is the creation of Pakistan today? If Hindus could live under the Muslim rule for a 1000 years, why not the other way round? Kashmir is there to stay with India permanently. Don't even think of separating it from India.
    
    Pakistan is tottering there and then they want Kashmiris to join their sinking boat! What brotherhood! Also, why don't you ask China to give up Tibet? Also, have a fair plebiscite in Pakistan, and see if you guys want to stay as a country, and which provinces will join India. Your nuclear weapons are not going to take you anywhere, give it up. Don't just beat your chests about India wanting to destroy you. That's simple insecurity and a diversion for your politicians and army. If not, keep your army well fed, well armed, so they can eat up all the Pakistani resources and hold you all to glorious ransom, like in the last 50 years. Pakistan needs so much counselling, don't know where to start! Sign the CTBT; that's a good start, next, nuclear weapons into the ocean don't forget.
    
    Praveen
    India
    
    
    
99. I don't believe that Pakistan should sign any CTBT. Indians have more resources than we do and therefore they will be able to upgrade their nuclear arsenal with the help of computer simulations and cold tests. Pakistan on the other hand does not have the required data and facilities to do the same. Besides, the western world has no problems with India acquiring regional power status; all this noise is because of Pakistan has this capability. Bottom line is that once in past 25 years we have been able to neutralise India in terms of weight. We should not sign this document. Remember no one came to protect the Bosnians. May God give courage to our rulers.
    
    Mufti Muhammad Ahmed
    Toronto
    
    
    
100. I am sure you are aware of the fact the CTBT signing is a very sensitive issue for Pakistanis in Pakistan and of course for Pakistanis living abroad. Since the time Pakistan exploded its nuclear device in Chagai, Baluchistan, all the world powers spearheaded by United States have been stressing upon the various governments in Islamabad to sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. But the Government in Islamabad realising the sensitivity and strategic significance of the treaty has decided to start a nation-wide dialogue at the media level to get some awareness about the point of view of the people of Pakistan. I think as the nuclear deterrent is very imperative now for the security of our country, signing this treaty would simply mean stopping the research and progress on such a vital program of our national significance. A vast majority of people of Pakistan living here in the USA is of the view that Pakistan must not compromise on this vital issue of national interest. However if India is ready to sign the treaty then Pakistan should consider signing it as well, otherwise we can't afford the luxury of unilaterally signing this and jeopardise our legitimate national security interest.
     
     If we look at the scenario at the South Asia level we find that India is all the time trying to impose its hegemonic policies on its neighbours. Its only Pakistan that is resisting its expansionist designs. India is by force denying the right of self-determination of the Kashmiri people and subjecting them to horrible violations of human rights. Were it not the nuclear capability of our country, India would have long attacked Pakistan. So I think that Pakistan must maintain its nuclear program at a level that is enough to stop any aggressor from threatening our security and national solidarity. The whole world knows that Pakistan is a country of peace-loving people and we want to live in peace and harmony with all our neighbours including India. If India is ready for a comprehensive test ban treaty then Pakistan will also sign it without delay otherwise we have every right not only to maintain our nuclear capability but also to continue research and experimentation to modernise it.
     
     Dr. Muhammad Javaid Rana
     United States of America
     
     
     
101. I think Pakistan should not sign the CTBT unless the Kashmir issue is resolved according to the wishes of the people of Kashmir and India's nuclear ambitions are brought under international control and check. Short of that by signing the CTBT, Pakistan would be seriously undermining and endangering its security.
     
     Refaat Shafkey
     USA
     
     
     
102. In my humble opinion, Pakistan must not sign the CTBT accord for the following reasons:
     1) Hypocrisy of the US: The United States which claims to be the "Champion of Democracy" has not signed any nuclear ban treaty. Recently the US congress has shown reluctance to sign any such treaty. Bullying Pakistan to sign it without India's compliance is purely hypocrisy of the West and the United States. Practising what you preach is very important in political matters also.
     2) Pakistan's security against India:
     Pakistan's security has been continuously threatened by India since its creation. India has dismembered Pakistan, and has no respect for any international treaties, like holding elections in Kashmir for the right of self-determination of its people. Illegal annexation of Hyderabad Deccan and Junagadh are other examples. India sponsors terrorism inside Pakistan through its RAW agents killing many innocent citizens. India refuses to open dialogue with Pakistan on Kashmir. The bomb is Pakistan's security against Indian
     expansionism aggressive designs.
     3) Impotent United Nation and Rise of Islam:
     If India attacks Pakistan for any reason, no United Nation, Western countries or United States is expected to help Pakistan. The UN has failed to implement UN resolutions on Kashmir. The human tragedy in Chechnya, Bosnia, Kosovo, Kashmir could have been ended by using sophisticated weapons of self-defence. The bomb is our weapon of self-defence. Pakistan has a right to defend itself, especially when there are no international guarantees and the hatred against Muslim countries is constantly propagandised in the West.
     
     Shahid Parvez
     Dallas, Texas
     
     
     

Back

Click Here to Visit our Sponsor

The News International Pakistan